I was listening to NPR a few weeks ago while pre-election news was still accosting my ears. Though not in my state (shockingly!), there was apparently a measure on the ballots in a lot of states referencing stem cell research. The title of the measure was, apparently, "Should any stem cell research be allowed?"
Okay, quick quiz: how did you first interpret that sentence? If you were in favor of certain varieties, but not all varieties of stem cell research, would you vote for it? In other words, does "any" mean "at least one type of" or "all types of"?
To me, and at least a few other people I've talked to, the prefered interpretation is "all"...it's also much easier to reach this interpretation if you put a bit of stress on "any." But it's also really easy to get the other interpretation by unstressing "any" or by putting another sentence in front of it (eg., "Stem cell research in all forms is purely evil." :P).
The strange thing is that I'm really having a hard time coming up with other examples where the preference for "all" is so strong (even with the stress). It seems that the fact that stem cell research is a class of things, rather than a single thing is important. It also seems that the presence of "should" is pretty much necessary. But even so, I really can't get anything else to come out with such a strong preference for "all".
So what does this have to do with NLP? Well, not too much other than language is hard. Something like this would probably kill a textual entailment system, but given that it's somewhat ambiguous even to people (the degree of ambiguity is person relative though: a Brit here tells me that he has a really hard time getting the "all" interpretation at all), maybe there's just nothing that can be done about it.
Plagiarism searches and post-publication review
2 hours ago
8 comments:
Hi Hal,
I fowarded this post to Lauri Karttunen who I work with and he tells me...
The classical example illustrating this particular ambiguity is:
"I am not going to force you to marry anybody."
said by an exasperated father to a recalcitrant daughter.
The 'any' can even be ommited: "she would like to marry an American".
Does she have a specific American in mind or would she settle for anyone?
Interesting...I was hoping to find a solid example that didn't contain a negation, though, as those always complicate scoping and quantification issues.
Re anon: I have a really hard time getting the "specific American" reading for that sentence, though perhaps I'm peculiar.
It's all in the context, Hal. Consider "Should any political refugee be granted asylum?" or "Should any frivolous lawsuit be given a hearing?" Stress certainly helps, but its complex, and different emphatic stresses on "any" could drive readings either way.
And while you may not want negation, the modal "should" is essentially providing the same service w.r.t. the syntax and semantics of "any". In fact, you only get the "some X" reading of "any X" in what are called "negative polarity contexts". Contrast "John ate anything" with the negative polarity example "John didn't eat anything".
As Hal notes, there's also complications from genericity. And sometimes it's hard to tell a generic from a hyperbolic universal. A statement like "John ate beans" can refer to a specific event, or it could refer to a generic state of being a bean-eater. For instance, you could say generically: "John ate beans as an infant, but hated them as a toddler" or specifically: "John ate beans for dinner Monday night, but not on Tuesday." The exercise is to substitute "anything" for "beans".
For those of you into translation, the even more interesting thing about negative polarity is that the rules vary by language, as do rules for stacking negations.
If you really like this kind of thing, check out my book on semantics; it covers these examples and dozens more, including interactions with negation, subject quantifiers, coordination, plurals (group and distributive), numerical modifiers, pied-piping, etc:
Type-Logical Semantics, 1998, MIT Press.
(continued)
in context:
"her parents give her a hard time because she wants to marry an American, and they're strict Hindus"
or something of the sort.
You're right that the previous "would like" phrasing makes the Specific American interpretation less plausible.
I think you're exactly right. Everyone who is in favor of Adult Stem Cell Research, would say yes to the question "Are you in favor of any stem cell research." It is bureaucracy trying to justify spending money, even if the people don't agree. If they do agree, great, do it. But don't use vague, misleading terms to trick them into it.
酒店經紀PRETTY GIRL 台北酒店經紀人 ,禮服店 酒店兼差PRETTY GIRL酒店公關 酒店小姐 彩色爆米花酒店兼職,酒店工作 彩色爆米花酒店經紀, 酒店上班,酒店工作 PRETTY GIRL酒店喝酒酒店上班 彩色爆米花台北酒店酒店小姐 PRETTY GIRL酒店上班酒店打工PRETTY GIRL酒店打工酒店經紀 彩色爆米花
Если кому интересно, лучший способ обезопасить человека от назойливых телефонных звонков - купить Подавитель связи
Post a Comment